https://tests.bitcoin.it/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&user=Pampa&feedformat=atomBitcoin Wiki - User contributions [en]2024-03-28T08:24:25ZUser contributionsMediaWiki 1.30.0https://tests.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Taras&diff=54903User talk:Taras2015-03-05T20:20:15Z<p>Pampa: </p>
<hr />
<div>Could you remove bitcoin fog advertisment from bitcoin wiki, because it scammed a lot of people?<br />
<br />
{{archive}}__TOC__<br />
== Can you at least consult with me ==<br />
<br />
...before editing "every" thing I write. Isn't that the point of this being a community wiki and not a centralized wiki?<br />
<br />
Why did you rename the PS Coin page (see how I'm consulting first before just undo-ing)?<br />
<br />
Additionally, I changed the "planned" template you edited back to "soon" which I originally had made - there is a very literal distinction between those words. Planned would imply uncertainty. We've already tackled the sufficient regulatory hurdles necessary, minus one additional step which we're in the process of completing now.<br />
<br />
{{unsigned|Bliljerk101|23:41, 8 February 2015 (UTC)}}<br />
<br />
:Is [[PS Coin]] really called "PS Coin - incentivized exchange"? They write that down as their name all the time? If it is, go ahead and put it back.<br />
<br />
:: I just feel the distinction would help in this case, since it's radically different than other exchanges (no other exchanges have an incentivized algorithm like PS Coin - it really should be in a category of its own) [[User:Bliljerk101|Bliljerk101]] ([[User talk:Bliljerk101|talk]]) 18:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:Also, "Planned" does not imply uncertainty. It is only used when implementation is imminent. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 14:37, 9 February 2015 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:: "Planned" implies the inherent uncertainty of any future event. Until it happens, it is always uncertain. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 06:09, 11 February 2015 (UTC)<br />
<br />
::: Do you think we should keep the "soon" template or otherwise distinguish scheduled implementations from dry internal speculation? [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 14:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)<br />
<br />
:::: [[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]], Thanks for your input here. [[User:Taras|Taras]], I think there is no reason to not keep both templates. However, in the case of [[PS Coin]] the "Soon" template should be used. Other exchanges may appropriately need to use a "planned" template instead. [[User:Bliljerk101|Bliljerk101]] ([[User talk:Bliljerk101|talk]]) 18:29, 11 February 2015 (UTC)</div>Pampahttps://tests.bitcoin.it/w/index.php?title=Talk:Bitcoin_Fog&diff=54902Talk:Bitcoin Fog2015-03-05T20:19:20Z<p>Pampa: </p>
<hr />
<div><br />
It would be nice, if you enable editing this page, because Bitcoin Fog scammed a lot of people.<br />
[https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=713095.0 Related thread] --[[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 19:23, 14 August 2014 (UTC)<br />
<br />
== Protecting links ==<br />
<br />
In order to prevent the insertion of malicious or fraudulent links onto this page, I will be locking the page. It can still be edited at [[Template:Bitcoin Fog content]]. This is so that users can contribute information without being able to tamper with the links. [[User:Taras|Taras]] ([[User talk:Taras|talk]]) 15:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)</div>Pampa