Scalability: Revision history

29 December 2020

• curprev 03:5003:50, 29 December 2020‎ Gmaxwell talk contribs‎ 14,262 bytes −13‎ This text was written before opencoin unethically bought the name "ripple" and stuck it on an unrelated centeralized system. Lightning is the moral successor to the ripple idea applied to Bitcoin..

27 June 2020

• curprev 13:1213:12, 27 June 2020‎ Furunodo talk contribs‎ 14,275 bytes +12‎ No edit summary
• curprev 13:0513:05, 27 June 2020‎ Furunodo talk contribs‎ m 14,263 bytes +4‎ No edit summary

6 June 2020

• curprev 13:5113:51, 6 June 2020‎ Furunodo talk contribs‎ 14,259 bytes −12‎ clarified ripple

15 February 2019

• curprev 20:2520:25, 15 February 2019‎ Belcher talk contribs‎ 14,271 bytes +25‎ Add to category scalability

12 May 2017

• curprev 17:2017:20, 12 May 2017‎ Belcher talk contribs‎ 14,246 bytes +1‎ →‎Related work: spelling
• curprev 17:1817:18, 12 May 2017‎ Belcher talk contribs‎ 14,245 bytes +69‎ →‎Related work: removed phrase "payment hubs"

4 December 2016

• curprev 19:4719:47, 4 December 2016‎ Midnightmagic talk contribs‎ 14,176 bytes +4,626‎ restoring original page edit. Reverting Mike's removal of useful mainpage material.

6 July 2016

• curprev 06:3006:30, 6 July 2016‎ Gmaxwell talk contribs‎ 9,550 bytes +171‎ note that this page is hopefully outdated.
• curprev 06:2406:24, 6 July 2016‎ Gmaxwell talk contribs‎ 9,379 bytes −1,191‎ →‎CPU: rm misinformation wrt ed25519. libsecp256k1 is now widely used in Bitcoin-- with options on it's considerably faster than ed25519 donna. The curve Bitcoin uses was specifically constructed for high speed and is very hard to beat in that respect

4 May 2016

• curprev 16:5216:52, 4 May 2016‎ Elias19r talk contribs‎ m 10,570 bytes −2‎ →‎Related work: fixing broken link

15 April 2016

• curprev 18:1918:19, 15 April 2016‎ Elias19r talk contribs‎ m 10,572 bytes +19‎ →‎Scalability targets

21 October 2015

• curprev 00:1400:14, 21 October 2015‎ Lapp0 talk contribs‎ 10,553 bytes +28‎ As explained, this page isn't about scaling the Bitcoin network and security concerns, rather scaling an individual Bitcoin client while not considering the effects on the network.

17 October 2015

• curprev 03:5303:53, 17 October 2015‎ Midnightmagic talk contribs‎ 10,525 bytes +56‎ historical marker because people have demonstrated FUD'ing using this page.

18 September 2015

• curprev 22:2822:28, 18 September 2015‎ Mike talk contribs‎ m 10,469 bytes +2‎ No edit summary
• curprev 22:2822:28, 18 September 2015‎ Mike talk contribs‎ 10,467 bytes −2,798‎ Move mention of Lightning Network to the end, delete material that isn't related to raw calculations about the existing protocol. This page is not meant to summarise the entire block size debate

10 July 2015

• curprev 07:3707:37, 10 July 2015‎ Lapp0 talk contribs‎ m 13,265 bytes +608‎ removed run on sentence, expanded on claim of low cost full nodes, removed mention of time improvements since security shouldn't be discussed in terms of maybe working in the future unless it is explicitly stated as "maybe it will work in the future".
• curprev 04:1604:16, 10 July 2015‎ Amincd talk contribs‎ 12,657 bytes +538‎ corrected incorrect processor requirement claim

15 June 2015

• curprev 04:1704:17, 15 June 2015‎ Lapp0 talk contribs‎ 12,119 bytes +57‎ rewording, added benefit
• curprev 04:1404:14, 15 June 2015‎ Lapp0 talk contribs‎ 12,062 bytes +8‎ fix broken link
• curprev 04:1304:13, 15 June 2015‎ Lapp0 talk contribs‎ 12,054 bytes +1,927‎ Added other scalability options

8 June 2015

• curprev 00:1500:15, 8 June 2015‎ Gappleto97 talk contribs‎ 10,127 bytes +66‎ →‎Scalability targets: Updated Visa max capacity

10 February 2015

• curprev 15:3515:35, 10 February 2015‎ Newar talk contribs‎ m 10,061 bytes +4‎ →‎CPU