Block size limit controversy: Revision history

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Diff selection: Mark the radio buttons of the revisions to compare and hit enter or the button at the bottom.
Legend: (cur) = difference with latest revision, (prev) = difference with preceding revision, m = minor edit.

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

24 April 2019

3 March 2019

5 May 2018

19 March 2018

13 March 2018

15 December 2017

4 December 2017

11 April 2016

14 February 2016

20 January 2016

1 December 2015

11 September 2015

4 September 2015

1 September 2015

22 August 2015

21 August 2015

20 August 2015

16 August 2015

12 August 2015

  • curprev 05:1905:19, 12 August 2015Lapp0 talk contribs 10,041 bytes +2 Moved fee cost to unclear arguments. Centralization argument needs clarification.
  • curprev 04:5804:58, 12 August 2015Lapp0 talk contribs 10,039 bytes −469 "Congestion" is a myth. A sufficient fee, as always, will get your transaction confirmed. Higher fees is a valid complaint, but "congestion" is not. Larger blocks cannot prevent the mempool from becoming too large and causing a client to crash.

10 August 2015

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)