Difference between revisions of "Talk:BlockExplorer.com"
m (Biteasy moved page Talk:Bitcoin Block Explorer to Talk:BlockExplorer.com: Current title is misleading as it implies that blockexplorer.com is the official Bitcoin Block Explorer, which is not the case.) |
m (Unsigned comment) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches? | + | Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches? {{Unsigned|Luke-jr|22:01, 23 January 2011}} |
:I thought about it, but I decided that 300 is meant for different formats of the same data. From the RFC: "The requested resource corresponds to any one of a set of '''representations'''". [[User:Theymos|theymos]] 04:01, 24 January 2011 (GMT) | :I thought about it, but I decided that 300 is meant for different formats of the same data. From the RFC: "The requested resource corresponds to any one of a set of '''representations'''". [[User:Theymos|theymos]] 04:01, 24 January 2011 (GMT) |
Latest revision as of 00:28, 15 August 2014
Why isn't HTTP 300 (Multiple Choices) used for ambiguous searches? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luke-jr (talk • contribs) at 22:01, 23 January 2011
- I thought about it, but I decided that 300 is meant for different formats of the same data. From the RFC: "The requested resource corresponds to any one of a set of representations". theymos 04:01, 24 January 2011 (GMT)