Category:Good pages: Difference between revisions

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "To be "good," a page must be: *fully referenced *well written *broad, yet focused *fully neutral *static (that is, not changing constantly) *well illustrated *generally helpful")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
To be "good," a page must be:
To be "good," a page must be:
*fully referenced
*well referenced or otherwise authentic
*relevant to Bitcoin
*well written
*well written
*broad, yet focused
*broad, yet focused
Line 7: Line 8:
*well illustrated
*well illustrated
*generally helpful
*generally helpful
*either about a defunct company/service or not about one at all
*not a stub
*in the mainspace and not a redirect
To mark a page as good put <nowiki>{{good}}</nowiki> anywhere on it.
Don't mark a page as good when it clearly is not.
Don't mark a product, company, organization, service or program page as a good page (unless it is defunct).

Revision as of 04:19, 18 August 2014

To be "good," a page must be:

  • well referenced or otherwise authentic
  • relevant to Bitcoin
  • well written
  • broad, yet focused
  • fully neutral
  • static (that is, not changing constantly)
  • well illustrated
  • generally helpful
  • either about a defunct company/service or not about one at all
  • not a stub
  • in the mainspace and not a redirect

To mark a page as good put {{good}} anywhere on it.

Don't mark a page as good when it clearly is not.

Don't mark a product, company, organization, service or program page as a good page (unless it is defunct).

Pages in category "Good pages"

The following 2 pages are in this category, out of 2 total.