User contributions for Casascius
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
25 November 2012
- 18:4918:49, 25 November 2012 diff hist +207 Invoice address →Multi-signature addresses: Remove the distinction between newer/older, as it's my understanding that we're not deprecating non-multisig transactions, calling it "older" will mislead people into thinking otherwise.
- 18:4518:45, 25 November 2012 diff hist −26 Invoice address →Addresses have a "private key": While true, this truth only appeals to those interested in number theory and will confuse most average Bitcoin users. This fixes that.
24 November 2012
- 04:3804:38, 24 November 2012 diff hist +648 BIP 0038 →Backwards compatibility
23 November 2012
- 19:3419:34, 23 November 2012 diff hist +87 BIP 0038 →Proposed specification
- 19:2919:29, 23 November 2012 diff hist 0 m BIP 0038 →Rationale
- 17:1517:15, 23 November 2012 diff hist +19 BIP 0038 Add BIP category; update test vectors with recent change
- 17:0917:09, 23 November 2012 diff hist +22 N Casascius/BIP draft for passphrase-protected private key Casascius moved page Casascius/BIP draft for passphrase-protected private key to BIP 0038: Move to BIP 0038 per Genjix current
- 17:0917:09, 23 November 2012 diff hist 0 m BIP 0038 Casascius moved page Casascius/BIP draft for passphrase-protected private key to BIP 0038: Move to BIP 0038 per Genjix
- 17:0817:08, 23 November 2012 diff hist −3 BIP 0038 Adding BIP 38 after contact with genjix
- 17:0817:08, 23 November 2012 diff hist +712 BIP 0038 reduce scrypt parameters for the second phase of the ec-multiply key, given that the length of the input alone (passpoint - 33 bytes) excludes brute force cracking without regard to parameters
22 November 2012
- 06:2206:22, 22 November 2012 diff hist +81 BIP 0038 →Reference implementation
- 06:1806:18, 22 November 2012 diff hist +2,030 BIP 0038 →Backwards compatibility
- 05:5205:52, 22 November 2012 diff hist 0 BIP 0038 →EC multiply, no compression
- 05:3005:30, 22 November 2012 diff hist +107 BIP 0038 →Reference implementation
- 05:2905:29, 22 November 2012 diff hist +2,071 BIP 0038 →Reference implementation
- 04:5904:59, 22 November 2012 diff hist +96 BIP 0038 No edit summary
- 04:5804:58, 22 November 2012 diff hist −25 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply mode is used
- 04:4504:45, 22 November 2012 diff hist 0 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply mode is used
- 04:1004:10, 22 November 2012 diff hist +31 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply mode is used
- 03:5303:53, 22 November 2012 diff hist +67 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply mode is used
21 November 2012
- 22:5622:56, 21 November 2012 diff hist +268 Invoice address →Addresses can be created offline
- 22:5122:51, 21 November 2012 diff hist 0 Invoice address Using the intentionally invalid address created for use with Wikipedia. This address is based on SHA1("Bitcoin"), made invalid by changing a character, and therefore belongs to no one.
- 22:4922:49, 21 November 2012 diff hist +160 Invoice address →What's in an address
- 22:4722:47, 21 November 2012 diff hist +1,652 Invoice address I am removing the part about a valid address starting with a 3 and added a section describing it.
- 20:5420:54, 21 November 2012 diff hist −130 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply flag is not used
- 20:5220:52, 21 November 2012 diff hist +23 BIP 0038 →Prefix
- 20:5220:52, 21 November 2012 diff hist +50 BIP 0038 →Prefix
- 20:5120:51, 21 November 2012 diff hist +168 BIP 0038 →Proposed specification
- 20:5020:50, 21 November 2012 diff hist +142 BIP 0038 →Prefix
- 20:4920:49, 21 November 2012 diff hist +8 BIP 0038 →Rationale
- 20:4620:46, 21 November 2012 diff hist +313 BIP 0038 →Proposed specification
- 20:3720:37, 21 November 2012 diff hist +756 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply flag is not used
- 20:3420:34, 21 November 2012 diff hist +17 BIP 0038 No edit summary
- 20:3120:31, 21 November 2012 diff hist +25 BIP 0038 →Rationale
- 20:3120:31, 21 November 2012 diff hist +1,764 BIP 0038 No edit summary
- 20:0220:02, 21 November 2012 diff hist 0 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply mode is used
- 19:5619:56, 21 November 2012 diff hist +112 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply mode is used
- 19:4319:43, 21 November 2012 diff hist +141 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply mode is used
- 19:3719:37, 21 November 2012 diff hist +163 BIP 0038 →Proposed specification
- 19:2819:28, 21 November 2012 diff hist +26 BIP 0038 →Proposed encoding for a passphrase-protected private key
- 19:2719:27, 21 November 2012 diff hist −948 BIP 0038 →Prefix
- 19:2419:24, 21 November 2012 diff hist +1,460 BIP 0038 →Proposed encoding for a passphrase-protected private key
- 19:0419:04, 21 November 2012 diff hist +63 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply flag is not used
- 19:0319:03, 21 November 2012 diff hist +288 BIP 0038 →Proposed specification
- 18:5618:56, 21 November 2012 diff hist +1,469 BIP 0038 No edit summary
- 18:3218:32, 21 November 2012 diff hist +78 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply flag is used
- 18:1118:11, 21 November 2012 diff hist −82 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply flag is used
- 05:4605:46, 21 November 2012 diff hist +142 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply flag is used
- 05:4205:42, 21 November 2012 diff hist −1,003 BIP 0038 →Example/Test Vector
- 05:4205:42, 21 November 2012 diff hist +81 BIP 0038 →Encryption when EC multiply flag is used