Search results

and two instances of it ("P2WPKH" and "P2WSH", see * Mainnet P2WPKH: <tt>bc1qw508d6qejxtdg4y5r3zarvary0c5xw7kv8f3t4</tt> ...

|P2WPKH |P2SH-P2WPKH ...

...to <code>OP_CHECKSIG</code><ref>Including pay-to-witness-public-key-hash (P2WPKH) described in BIP141</ref>, <code>OP_CHECKSIGVERIFY</code>, <code>OP_CHECKM ...

* ''P2WPKH'' * ''P2SH-P2WPKH'' ...

...t called Bech32. It is in use for segregated witness outputs of version 0 (P2WPKH and P2WSH, see [[bip-0141.mediawiki|BIP141]]), and other applications. Version 0 outputs (specifically, P2WPKH and P2WSH addresses) continue to use Bech32<ref>'''Why not permit both Bech ...

* Case: PSBT with one P2PKH input and one P2SH-P2WPKH input. First input is signed and finalized. Outputs are empty ...P2PKH input and one P2SH-P2WPKH input both with non-final scriptSigs. P2SH-P2WPKH input's redeemScript is available. Outputs filled. ...

...e cost per payment for a native segwit [[P2WPKH]] transaction paying other P2WPKH outputs: ...he cost of spending one input to one output, which is about 110 vbytes for P2WPKH inputs/outputs. Also, if you combine inputs that were originally sent to a ...

Transactions which do not have any native segwit (such as P2WPKH or P2WSH) inputs must use the legacy transaction format. Witness fields are ...

...and the immediately following odd byte value that are both not yet used in P2WPKH or P2WSH spending. To indicate the annex, only an "unpaired" available byte ...eaf versions that would conflict with a valid first byte of either a valid P2WPKH pubkey or a valid P2WSH script (that is, both ''v'' and ''v | 1'' should be ...

| P2WPKH || <code>1 << 1</code> || <code>0x0002</code> || 1 ...

| Derivation scheme for P2WPKH-nested-in-P2SH based accounts ...

...ey spends (assuming deployment was fleshed out in a way similar to BIP 141 P2WPKH and P2WSH), however this proposal only applies to signatures via tapscript, ...

* <tt>wpkh(KP)</tt> (top level or inside <tt>sh</tt> only): P2WPKH output for the given compressed pubkey. ...