User contributions for Gmaxwell
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
8 January 2012
- 02:1702:17, 8 January 2012 diff hist +235 P2Pool →Miners: On share difficulty and LPs.
- 02:1502:15, 8 January 2012 diff hist 0 m P2Pool →Stales: case.
- 02:1202:12, 8 January 2012 diff hist +3 m P2Pool →Stales: copyediting
- 02:1202:12, 8 January 2012 diff hist +427 P2Pool →Stales: on stale types.
- 02:0602:06, 8 January 2012 diff hist 0 P2Pool No edit summary
- 02:0602:06, 8 January 2012 diff hist −3 m P2Pool Minor copyediting.
- 02:0302:03, 8 January 2012 diff hist +1,209 P2Pool on stales
- 01:3301:33, 8 January 2012 diff hist +662 P2Pool →History: on donating to p2pool miners.
- 01:1201:12, 8 January 2012 diff hist +178 P2Pool re: donations
- 01:0901:09, 8 January 2012 diff hist +262 P2Pool some elaboration.
- 01:0401:04, 8 January 2012 diff hist +85 N File:P2pool chain.png Visualization of the P2Pool sidechain. current
7 January 2012
- 23:4623:46, 7 January 2012 diff hist +425 P2Pool some elaboration.
4 January 2012
- 20:0620:06, 4 January 2012 diff hist −5 m Talk:Hardfork Wishlist →Proposals which reduce security: oops2
- 20:0520:05, 4 January 2012 diff hist +1 m Talk:Hardfork Wishlist →Proposals which reduce security: oops
- 20:0120:01, 4 January 2012 diff hist +356 Talk:Hardfork Wishlist →Proposals which reduce security
- 19:5919:59, 4 January 2012 diff hist +1,372 N Talk:Hardfork Wishlist Created page with " ==Proposals which reduce security== "Difficulty adjustment should adapt to sudden hashrate loss" It's really hard to construct ''general'' proofs, but I believe that _all_ s..."
- 19:5019:50, 4 January 2012 diff hist +71 Hardfork Wishlist →Bug fixes: Removing subsidy-drop changes as a non-viable economically significant change.
- 19:4819:48, 4 January 2012 diff hist +53 Hardfork Wishlist →Cryptographic changes
- 19:4719:47, 4 January 2012 diff hist +27 Hardfork Wishlist →Transaction behavior changes
- 19:4619:46, 4 January 2012 diff hist +10 Hardfork Wishlist →Changes to hard-coded limits
- 19:4519:45, 4 January 2012 diff hist +178 Hardfork Wishlist →Transaction behavior changes
- 19:3519:35, 4 January 2012 diff hist +309 Hardfork Wishlist →Transaction behavior changes
3 January 2012
- 22:3522:35, 3 January 2012 diff hist +132 Hardfork Wishlist →Cryptographic changes
- 22:3322:33, 3 January 2012 diff hist +49 Hardfork Wishlist →Currency changes
- 22:2822:28, 3 January 2012 diff hist 0 Hardfork Wishlist →Major structural changes
- 22:2622:26, 3 January 2012 diff hist +597 Hardfork Wishlist now we just wait for luke's proposals for tonal bitcoin and mixed radix bitcoin…
- 22:0322:03, 3 January 2012 diff hist +260 Hardfork Wishlist No edit summary
- 22:0122:01, 3 January 2012 diff hist +424 Hardfork Wishlist more stuff
- 21:5821:58, 3 January 2012 diff hist +685 Hardfork Wishlist Add some stuff.
28 December 2011
- 16:5016:50, 28 December 2011 diff hist +13 Help:FAQ →Is it not a waste of energy?
- 16:4816:48, 28 December 2011 diff hist +19 m Help:FAQ →How long does "synchronizing" take when the bitcoin client is first installed? What is it doing?: clarify resources, it does use a good amount of disk space.
- 16:4316:43, 28 December 2011 diff hist +54 m Help:FAQ →How long does "synchronizing" take when the bitcoin client is first installed? What is it doing?
- 16:4016:40, 28 December 2011 diff hist +28 m Help:FAQ →How long does "synchronizing" take when the bitcoin client is first installed? What is it doing?: more tweaks to synchup language.
- 16:3716:37, 28 December 2011 diff hist +52 Help:FAQ →How long does "synchronizing" take when the bitcoin client is first installed? What is it doing?
- 16:3616:36, 28 December 2011 diff hist −29 m Help:FAQ →How long does "synchronizing" take when the bitcoin client is first installed? What is it doing?: synchupfixes.
- 16:3216:32, 28 December 2011 diff hist +1,421 Help:FAQ →Sending and Receiving Payments: on synchup
- 16:1816:18, 28 December 2011 diff hist +626 Help:FAQ On TXN fees
23 December 2011
- 04:1304:13, 23 December 2011 diff hist +274 Talk:BIP 0014 →Arguments about requirements
- 04:0804:08, 23 December 2011 diff hist +866 Talk:BIP 0014 →Arguments about requirements: new section
28 November 2011
- 01:2001:20, 28 November 2011 diff hist +419 Zero Knowledge Contingent Payment →But what if they're just anti-social and don't redeem the txn?
- 01:1301:13, 28 November 2011 diff hist +1,092 Zero Knowledge Contingent Payment refund
- 01:0501:05, 28 November 2011 diff hist +16 Zero Knowledge Contingent Payment No edit summary
- 01:0401:04, 28 November 2011 diff hist +23 Zero Knowledge Contingent Payment No edit summary
- 01:0301:03, 28 November 2011 diff hist +63 Zero Knowledge Contingent Payment →Zero knowledge contingent payments
- 01:0101:01, 28 November 2011 diff hist +15 Zero Knowledge Contingent Payment →Zero knowledge contingent payments
- 00:3500:35, 28 November 2011 diff hist +46 Zero Knowledge Contingent Payment →Zero knowledge contingent payments
- 00:3200:32, 28 November 2011 diff hist +2,825 N Zero Knowledge Contingent Payment Zero knowledge contingent payments
22 November 2011
- 07:5907:59, 22 November 2011 diff hist +15 Deflationary spiral Bitcoin is fiat money too— it's a fiat of a mostly immutable distributed protocol, not a government subject to political whim, but a fiat none the less.
- 07:5807:58, 22 November 2011 diff hist −1,396 Deflationary spiral The 'supply' vs 'demand' argument doesn't make sense, you can do bitcoin transactions in very fine units so if it goes up in value it's not like you can't get enough to make discrete payments. Also rm all the stuff about bitcoin currently going up
- 07:4707:47, 22 November 2011 diff hist −704 Deflationary spiral Remove text about changing the software, if you make that kind of change it won't communicate with other bitcoin nodes— effectively it won't be bitcoin anymore. Easier to get an alternative adopted instead.