Difference between revisions of "Mixing service"

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Add reference to alternate mixing method involving blockchain betting.)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
Mixing large amounts of money may itself be illegal, being in violation of [[Wikipedia:Structuring|anti-structuring laws]].
 
Mixing large amounts of money may itself be illegal, being in violation of [[Wikipedia:Structuring|anti-structuring laws]].
 +
 +
There has been in Bitcoin's history the situation where an exchange has blacklisted bitcoin deposits due to them having taint and descending from bitcoins that were stolen<ref>[http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=73385.0 Mt Gox thinks it's the Fed. Freezes acc based on "tainted" coins.]</ref>.  Unless the exchange follows the trail, manual or lightly automated mixing methods can make detection of taint more difficult<ref>[http://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=79079.0 Blockchain-based betting services function as mixing services?]</ref> even though this approach may not protect privacy like a true mixing service would.
  
 
==See Also==
 
==See Also==

Revision as of 23:28, 15 May 2012

Mixes ones funds with others with the intention to confuse the trail back to the original source of the funds.

Compared to the traditional financial systems this service might be the equivalent of moving funds through banks located in countries that have strict bank-secrecy laws. Such countries include the Cayman Islands, the Bahamas, and Panama[1].

Mixing helps protect privacy however mixing can also be used for money laundering.

The term money laundering refers to the practice where this mixing is performed because the funds are illegally obtained. After laundering, the funds appear legitimate[2].

Mixing large amounts of money may itself be illegal, being in violation of anti-structuring laws.

There has been in Bitcoin's history the situation where an exchange has blacklisted bitcoin deposits due to them having taint and descending from bitcoins that were stolen[3]. Unless the exchange follows the trail, manual or lightly automated mixing methods can make detection of taint more difficult[4] even though this approach may not protect privacy like a true mixing service would.

See Also

References