Search results

Jump to: navigation, search
  • 11 KB (1,705 words) - 12:58, 2 February 2024
  • 6 KB (1,074 words) - 15:56, 18 July 2015
  • 3 KB (407 words) - 19:24, 16 August 2015
  • Arguably, it negates the benefit of replacement, making it comparable to [[child-pays-for-parent]] (non-replacement) policies.
    8 KB (1,115 words) - 08:43, 24 November 2022
  • 22 KB (3,425 words) - 18:29, 24 April 2024
  • 3 KB (442 words) - 20:08, 30 April 2024
  • 3 KB (414 words) - 20:19, 30 April 2024
  • 5 KB (848 words) - 21:49, 30 April 2024
  • 28 KB (4,234 words) - 18:44, 24 April 2024
  • 8 KB (1,266 words) - 10:29, 2 December 2016
  • ...ction fees#Feerates_for_dependent_transactions_.28child-pays-for-parent.29|child-pays-for-parent]], or CPFP) or replace the stuck transaction (called [[replace by fee|repla
    15 KB (2,553 words) - 23:28, 14 January 2019
  • 8 KB (1,293 words) - 11:09, 6 April 2021
  • 4 KB (524 words) - 17:59, 24 September 2019
  • # The recipient uses [[CPFP|child-pays-for-parent (CPFP)]] to get the first transaction to ''also'' confirm. You have now pai
    2 KB (320 words) - 03:36, 25 May 2017
  • 19 KB (2,892 words) - 23:00, 22 April 2024
  • 20 KB (3,076 words) - 17:58, 24 September 2019
  • 7 KB (1,098 words) - 07:44, 2 August 2020
  • 130 KB (21,097 words) - 21:38, 30 April 2024
  • 11 KB (1,767 words) - 17:59, 24 September 2019
  • ...at this approach has drawbacks: relative timelocks prevent fee-bumping via child-pays-for-parent, and have the obvious drawback of making the funds temporarily unusable unt
    20 KB (3,134 words) - 23:13, 29 September 2022

View (previous 20 | next 20) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)