Difference between revisions of "Talk:BIP Draft - Instant Partial Confirmation"

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Unsigned comment)
 
(One intermediate revision by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
+
I would think it would be simpler to code if the initial implementation just sent the hash of the transaction and the miners checked it was in their memorypool rather than sending the whole thing and expecting them to add it to the pool. {{unsigned|Nibor|14:27, 1 August 2012}}
I would think it would be simpler to code if the initial implementation just sent the hash of the transaction and the miners checked it was in their memorypool rather than sending the whole thing and expecting them to add it too the pool.
 

Latest revision as of 00:05, 15 August 2014

I would think it would be simpler to code if the initial implementation just sent the hash of the transaction and the miners checked it was in their memorypool rather than sending the whole thing and expecting them to add it to the pool. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nibor (talkcontribs) at 14:27, 1 August 2012