Difference between revisions of "Talk:Comparison of mining pools"
ChocoboLee (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
The note about pool hashrate being largely irrelevant is wrong. The pool hashrate determines variance of your payout. A pool with a large hashrate is more likely to have frequent and predictable payouts. --[[User:ChocoboLee|ChocoboLee]] 07:51, 11 July 2011 (GMT) | The note about pool hashrate being largely irrelevant is wrong. The pool hashrate determines variance of your payout. A pool with a large hashrate is more likely to have frequent and predictable payouts. --[[User:ChocoboLee|ChocoboLee]] 07:51, 11 July 2011 (GMT) | ||
| + | * Largely irrelevant != completely irrelevant. In general, once you get past a certain point (eg, about 150 times your own hashrate), it ceases to make any significant difference. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] 14:55, 11 July 2011 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 14:55, 11 July 2011
Hashrate entries should be automatically fetched every hour or so. SmokeTooMuch 23:56, 8 June 2011 (GMT)
- I agree, but want to add that a 24 hour median value would be a good idea. Not everyone an a specific region is online 24/7. This would even everything out.--Neptop 08:46, 9 June 2011 (GMT)
The note about pool hashrate being largely irrelevant is wrong. The pool hashrate determines variance of your payout. A pool with a large hashrate is more likely to have frequent and predictable payouts. --ChocoboLee 07:51, 11 July 2011 (GMT)
- Largely irrelevant != completely irrelevant. In general, once you get past a certain point (eg, about 150 times your own hashrate), it ceases to make any significant difference. --Luke-jr 14:55, 11 July 2011 (GMT)
