Difference between revisions of "Talk:Firstbits"

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Reverting unback claims: new section)
 
(Reverting unback claims)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
[[User:Ripper234|Ripper234]] ([[User talk:Ripper234|talk]]) 01:54, 1 May 2013 (GMT)
 
[[User:Ripper234|Ripper234]] ([[User talk:Ripper234|talk]]) 01:54, 1 May 2013 (GMT)
 +
 +
: Reverting ''with'' a discussion: I'm not aware of a single developer who disagrees with the position stated. --[[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]] ([[User talk:Luke-jr|talk]]) 05:20, 2 May 2013 (GMT)

Revision as of 05:20, 2 May 2013

Reverting unback claims

Reverting claims that

Firstbits is generally considered to be a bad idea because it encourages transaction spam.
This position is held by most, if not all, of Bitcoin developers.

"transaction spam" is not a generally accepted meaningful term - any transaction is legitimate. Certainly such a strong claim that presumes to speak on behalf of "most or all of the devs" must be backed by evidence.

Luke-Jr, please do not revert this without a discussion, and do not add the claim with a prefix such as "According to some".

Ripper234 (talk) 01:54, 1 May 2013 (GMT)

Reverting with a discussion: I'm not aware of a single developer who disagrees with the position stated. --Luke-jr (talk) 05:20, 2 May 2013 (GMT)