Difference between revisions of "Talk:OP CHECKSIG"
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
=Code samples and raw dumps= | =Code samples and raw dumps= | ||
| − | + | The disassembled code sample doesn't seem to be coherent with the result="(...)" part and with the script below. | |
| − | + | fixed some of them, but there are still errors | |
Revision as of 10:20, 30 July 2011
Redundant step?
Under "How it works", we have steps 2 and 6:
- 2. A new subscript is created from the instruction from the most recent OP_CODESEPARATOR to the end of the script. If there is no OP_CODESEPARATOR the entire script becomes the subscript (hereby referred to as subScript)
- 6. All OP_CODESEPARATORS are removed from subScript
However, doesn't step 6 seem redundant? Vegard
Code samples and raw dumps
The disassembled code sample doesn't seem to be coherent with the result="(...)" part and with the script below.
fixed some of them, but there are still errors
