Difference between revisions of "Talk:OP CHECKSIG"

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Code samples and raw dumps)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
However, doesn't step 6 seem redundant? [[User:Vegard|Vegard]]
 
However, doesn't step 6 seem redundant? [[User:Vegard|Vegard]]
 
=Code samples and raw dumps=
 
The disassembled code sample doesn't seem to be coherent with the result="(...)" part and with the script below.
 
fixed some of them, but there are still errors
 

Revision as of 14:38, 30 July 2011

Redundant step?

Under "How it works", we have steps 2 and 6:

- 2. A new subscript is created from the instruction from the most recent OP_CODESEPARATOR to the end of the script. If there is no OP_CODESEPARATOR the entire script becomes the subscript (hereby referred to as subScript)

- 6. All OP_CODESEPARATORS are removed from subScript

However, doesn't step 6 seem redundant? Vegard