Difference between revisions of "User talk:Taras"

From Bitcoin Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(admin rights)
(Proposed block of user Luke-jr)
Line 14: Line 14:
  
 
To avoid having this article reappear, it might be best to blank the page while keeping it protected. [[User:Lunokhod|Lunokhod]] ([[User talk:Lunokhod|talk]]) 09:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 
To avoid having this article reappear, it might be best to blank the page while keeping it protected. [[User:Lunokhod|Lunokhod]] ([[User talk:Lunokhod|talk]]) 09:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 +
 +
==Proposed block of user [[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]]==
 +
Hi there, in addition to the above proposed article deletion, with further research and run ins with the "overseer" of that page, I kindly ask that you consider blocking the user account [[User:Luke-jr|Luke-jr]]. I have never once asked such a thing before on any of the wiki's I edit, so I do not do so lightly.
 +
 +
To summarize:
 +
 +
# If you look at the editing history of [[Tonal Bitcoin]], you will see that user Luke-Jr has reverted almost every single edit that has been made to this page. This has been done with no discussion on the talk page. This manner in which the edits are reverted are done so in a fanatical way, and this applies to several users that have attempted to contribute to this page, not just one.
 +
# If you look at the history of the talk pages, you will see that several people have made sensible comments. Furthermore several people have previously made arguements for why this page should be deleted. However, Luke-jr has consistently removed these comments from the talk page, affectively stopping all further discussion, or ending in a revert-war. Though it is common to to have differences in the content of a wiki page, I have never seen a user in my life revert to removing comments and discussions posted on the talk page.
 +
# With regard to the above point, I emphasize that Gavin Andresen himself (!) commented on the talk page, suggesting that this page be removed. Luke -Jr had the gaul to even remove this comment from such a member of high standing in the bitcoin community.
 +
# If you look at this user's talk page, you will notice that he has consistently blanked his page after receiving comments about his edits on other pages.
 +
# If you look at his editing history, you will see that he consistently makes edits that go against community consensus, all while giving little-to-no justification.
 +
# Finally, as seen in the tonal bitcoin forum, he accuses all members that are not on his side (i.e., everyone in the tonal bitcoin case) to be trolling. At the very least, this is not very kind. At the worst, this behavior is itself trolling.
 +
 +
[[User:Lunokhod|Lunokhod]] ([[User talk:Lunokhod|talk]]) 10:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 10:10, 22 August 2014

Here I am hello Taras (talk) 21:49, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Love you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taras (talkcontribs)

admin rights

you have admin rights on the english wiki. that means you can move/delete pages when you deem it appropriate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nanotube (talkcontribs) at 02:41, 14 August 2014‎

Acknowledged :) Taras (talk) 02:46, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed article for deletion

Hi, I would like to propose deleting the article Tonal Bitcoin. I have added a justification here

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Talk:Tonal_Bitcoin

To avoid having this article reappear, it might be best to blank the page while keeping it protected. Lunokhod (talk) 09:42, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed block of user Luke-jr

Hi there, in addition to the above proposed article deletion, with further research and run ins with the "overseer" of that page, I kindly ask that you consider blocking the user account Luke-jr. I have never once asked such a thing before on any of the wiki's I edit, so I do not do so lightly.

To summarize:

  1. If you look at the editing history of Tonal Bitcoin, you will see that user Luke-Jr has reverted almost every single edit that has been made to this page. This has been done with no discussion on the talk page. This manner in which the edits are reverted are done so in a fanatical way, and this applies to several users that have attempted to contribute to this page, not just one.
  2. If you look at the history of the talk pages, you will see that several people have made sensible comments. Furthermore several people have previously made arguements for why this page should be deleted. However, Luke-jr has consistently removed these comments from the talk page, affectively stopping all further discussion, or ending in a revert-war. Though it is common to to have differences in the content of a wiki page, I have never seen a user in my life revert to removing comments and discussions posted on the talk page.
  3. With regard to the above point, I emphasize that Gavin Andresen himself (!) commented on the talk page, suggesting that this page be removed. Luke -Jr had the gaul to even remove this comment from such a member of high standing in the bitcoin community.
  4. If you look at this user's talk page, you will notice that he has consistently blanked his page after receiving comments about his edits on other pages.
  5. If you look at his editing history, you will see that he consistently makes edits that go against community consensus, all while giving little-to-no justification.
  6. Finally, as seen in the tonal bitcoin forum, he accuses all members that are not on his side (i.e., everyone in the tonal bitcoin case) to be trolling. At the very least, this is not very kind. At the worst, this behavior is itself trolling.

Lunokhod (talk) 10:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)